Authors are expected to present original research that has not been
published elsewhere. All data, methods, and findings should be
accurately reported, without fabrication, falsification, or
inappropriate data manipulation. Authors must properly acknowledge the
contributions of others, including citing relevant work. Plagiarism,
in any form, is unacceptable and will result in the rejection of the
submitted paper. Furthermore, authors should disclose any potential
conflicts of interest that might influence the results or
interpretation of their work. Submitting the same manuscript to
multiple conferences or journals simultaneously is considered
unethical and is strictly prohibited.
Responsibilities of Reviewers:
Reviewers play a critical role in the peer review process, and they
are expected to provide fair, objective, and constructive feedback on
submitted manuscripts. They should evaluate the work based on its
intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual
orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or
political philosophy of the authors. Reviewers must maintain the
confidentiality of the manuscripts they review and must not use
information obtained during the peer review process for personal gain.
Any potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed to the
editorial board, and reviewers should recuse themselves from the
review process if they feel unable to provide an impartial evaluation.
Responsibilities of the Editorial Board:
The editorial board is responsible for ensuring the integrity of the
publication process. They should make decisions on submissions based
solely on the academic merit of the work and its relevance to the
conference’s scope. The editorial board must ensure that the review
process is conducted fairly, confidentially, and without bias. They
are also responsible for identifying and addressing any ethical issues
that may arise, such as suspected plagiarism, data manipulation, or
conflicts of interest. The board is committed to maintaining
transparency throughout the publication process and will take
appropriate action in cases of malpractice, which may include
rejecting manuscripts, issuing retractions, or reporting misconduct to
the authors’ institutions.
Handling Ethical Misconduct:
The “conference Name” takes ethical misconduct seriously and has
established procedures to address such issues. If unethical behaviour
is suspected, the editorial board will investigate the matter
thoroughly. If misconduct is confirmed, appropriate actions will be
taken, which may include the rejection of the manuscript, notifying
the authors’ institutions, and banning the authors from future
participation in the conference. All investigations and actions will
be conducted in accordance with the principles of fairness,
confidentiality, and transparency.
Plagiarism Prevention:
To maintain the integrity of the conference proceedings, all submitted
manuscripts will be screened for plagiarism using specialized
detection software. Manuscripts found to have a similarity index
exceeding 10% will be scrutinized, and authors may be asked to revise
or provide explanations for the overlaps. Instances of confirmed
plagiarism will lead to the rejection of the manuscript and may result
in further disciplinary actions.
